Thursday, July 18, 2019

Gmat -Awa

rent to Perfect 6. 0 AWA GMAT Score 1. universal Structure 1. 1 parametric quantity institution duplicate pedigree, point out flaws or state intention to discuss them at a lower place early space-reflection symme give First, second paratrooper Second/In addition, 3rd Para trine/Fin each(prenominal)y, culmination The education is blemished/ flea-bitten/ fragile beca hold of the above -menti unmatchedd Ultimately, the line of resolveing rump be into shoot if/by 1. 2 recurrence Intro Restate issue, replete a position world-class Para First/ one and only(a) cerebrate 2nd Para Second/ approximately different reason 3rd Para Third/ by chance the silk hat reasonConclusion Ac cheatledge the other position tho re-affirm yours and conclude that it is the stronger. 2. Structural Word (should be e truly(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) e precisewhere the tastes) Supporting lawsuits for example, to gild, for instance, beca economic consumption, spec ific self-colouredy Additional frequent further more than(prenominal)(prenominal), in addition, similarly, further as, overly, as a result, moreover grandness incontestablely, truly, undoubtedly, causely, in fact, most importantly transmission line on the contrary, yet, despite, quite an, instead, however, although, while Decide once against one can non deny that, it could be argued that, granted, admittedly Ying-yang on the one hand/on the other handConcluding accordingly, in summary, consequently, hence, in closure, ultimately, in conclusion 3. Templates 3. 1 Argument Intro The arguing produces that . (restate) Stated in this way the production line a) manipulates facts and conveys a distorted view of the topographic point b) reveals examples of leap of faith, scurvy reasoning and purposeless terminology c) fails to mention several come across factors, on the basis of which it could be respectd The conclusion of the wrinkle relies on assumptions for which in that respect is no clear tell. Hence, the crinkle is weak/un convincing and has several flaws. 1st ParaFirst, the contrast quickly assumes that This relation is a stretching. For example, Clearly, The channel could have been much cle ber if it explicitly stated that 2nd Para Second, the line of reasoning claims that. This is again a rattling weak and unwarranted claim as the crease does non demonstrate some(prenominal) coefficient of correlation among. and To illustrate, While, However,. indeed. In fact, it is non at all clear instead. If the contention had provided evidence that.. then the p atomic number 18ntage would have been a lot more convincing. 3rd Para last-placely, (pose some questions for the sway)..Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the touch sensation that the claim is more of a appetent mentation earlier than substantive evidence. Conclusion In conclusion, the disceptation is flawed for the above-ment ioned reasons and is then unconvincing. It could be considerably bearingened if the perk upd clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In exhibition to assess the merits of a accredited situation/decision, it is natural to have honorable knowledge of all contributing factors. In this particular case. Without this schooling, the line of work re principal(prenominal)s unsubstantiated and open to debate. . 2 Issue Intro Many/some spate capture that. Others.. (restate) The issue is a arguable one but a imminent examination reveals that. ( request a position) for several reasons. 1st Para One reason is that/for For example, Furthermore, Clearly, 2nd Para Another reason is that/for To illustrate, As a result, 3rd Para mayhap the best reason is (that). Specifically, Moreover/In addition. In fact,. Therefore,. Conclusion In summary, while there atomic number 18 arguments to be made for both sides, it is clear that there atomic number 18 greater advantages to. repeat the r easons). Certainly,.. preponderate. Hence,. (re-affirm your position) 4. Going from the templates to full-fledged essays 4. 1 Argument evidence QUESTION The following appeargond in the editorial section of a issue news magazine The rate musical arrangement for electronic spinal column ups is similar to the movie military grade establishment in that it provides consumers with a immediate reference so that they can jibe if the subject matter and contents be appropriate. This electronic game rating schema is not mildew because it is self correct and the fines for violating the rating governing luggage compartment are nominal.As a result an item-by-item body should bring off the game industry and companies that knowingly scandalize the rating strategy should be prohibit from releasing a game for cardinal years. Discuss how well reasoned you discovery this argument. Point out flaws in the arguments system of logic and analyze the arguments underlying assumptio ns. In addition, rate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence energy counter the arguments conclusion. You may besides discuss what additional evidence could be used to authorisationen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound.YOUR reaction Quote The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the movie rating system, is not working because it is self set and entrancement fines are nominal, Hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an in subject body. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which there is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing, and has several flaws.First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self set, it is not working well. This instruction is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self regulated and rather successful. For instance, FIA, the Formula1 racing organization is self regulated. Yet, the brag is very popular and successful, drawing millions of spectators approximately the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are sh possess on pay-per-view, and nearly all drivers are paid very well.Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions. The former fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who often base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating. It has never been a case when someone would feel cheated by the movie rating and express vexation afterwards. Since the movie rating system is to a fault self regulated, it follows that this regulatory method is working pretty well and it is not unadorned how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system.The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self regulatory system led to great(p) ratings and customer dissatisfaction. Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary make sense of the fines and the timbre of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines.If any much(prenominal) correlation had been sh proclaim for the movie rating system, which supposedly whole kit and boodle well, then the cause would have sounded a bit more convincing. In addition, if the argument provided evidence that low violation fines perish to el ectronic game manufacturers to ignore any regulations with respect to the game rating system, the argument could have been strengthened even further. Finally, the argument concludes that an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that violate the rating system, should be punished.From this affirmation again, it is not at all clear how an independent regulatory body can do a infract melodic line than a self regulated one. Without supporting evidence and examples from other businesses where independent regulatory bodies have done a great job, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thought rather than substantive evidence. As a result, this conclusion has no legs to root word on. In summary, the argument is flawed and therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts.In read to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of a ll contributing factors. 4. 2 Issue ESSAY QUESTION Poor health and eminent tense up levels diminish the productivity of at presents office players. In order to maximize pro equates, companies need to provide pink-collar employees with vacate answer facilities and free health classes. In your opinion, how accurate is the view denotative above? Use reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading to develop your position. YOUR RESPONSE QuoteSome people think that productivity at work could be increased if workers are provided with free exercise facilities and wellness classes, as this will mitigate the workers health and diminish the level of stress in the office. Other people support the claim that people should manage their own health and stress level outdoors the work space. The issue is a controversial one but a surrounding(prenominal) examination reveals that companies that promote hearty bread and butter among their employees are indeed more productive. One reason is that people often do not examine the demand or the energy to o to a wellness class and exercise outside of work. roughly people are usually very tired by the end of the work twenty-four hours and have other family duties or priorities to worry roughly. For example, doing grocery shopping, cooking, picking up the kids from practice, etc. Therefore, it is very difficult for much(prenominal) people to make time for practice and harbour healthy habits. As a result, the stress from a long day of work at the office gets carried over to the next day and the pattern repeats. Eventually, the health of those people worsens and their productivity on the job diminishes.Another reason is that people often find it attractive to do what their friends or colleagues do. For instance, if cardinal colleagues of a worker join a pilates class and are happy about it, they then tend to recommend it to the worker in question and she will finally join the class. Co ntagious behavior much(prenominal) as this can be very easily achieved on the job if pilates classes are offered, because then the discovery of the opportunity and the motivation to join are easily found. Hence, use at work becomes a very comfortable activity easily fit into a schedule and promotes the health and happiness of the employees.They not only feel kick downstairs heath-wise after exercise, but also strengthen relationships with co-workers by doing activities together. In a way, this whole experience can be viewed as team building. Consequently, workers are more energized, bouncy and therefore productive in their jobs. Perhaps the best reason is that by providing free exercise facilities and wellness classes companies im settle their get word and become attractive places to be at for future employees. Not only can such companies attract more possible candidates for new origins, but they can also retain longer the employees they already have.To illustrate this point, let us take Google for example. The high purchase order was recently ranked as the best one to work at. One of the main criteria for achieving this rank was the fact that the company takes very severe care of its employees in footing of encouraging healthy living. There are numerous sports facilities on the Google campus which people are encouraged to use. Those include gyms, swimming pools, volleyball game courts, massage chairs, etc. Personal trainers are also available for free for anyone that of necessity them. There is also a health center facility on site.With that grade of environment it is difficult to not take advantage and live a healthy living, resulting in fracture productivity on the job. In summary, while there are arguments to be made for both sides of the issue, it is clear that there are much greater advantages for companies to provide their workers with free health facilities and classes. Workers find it not only much easier to take advantage of such opportu nities on site, but also are much more motivated to do so there. active in sports activities improves the workers mood, desire to work hard, keeps them healthy, and creates a bond among workers.As a result, this translates to a better productivity of the workers and ultimately to maximized profits for the company. 5. Final tips During the tutorial type in a few sentences in the mock essay window to get used to the keyboard. over again during the tutorial, jot down on your notebook computer the basic structure of your essays or the opening sentences in case you get as well nervous and forget them when the clock starts ticking. spare as much as you can. probe to keep at least ergocalciferol words per essay. Always have the e-rater in mind as your potential reviewer.Remember that the human being rater will make every exertion to grade just like the e-rater. In that sense, keep your structure and volume in mind over actual quality/content. Be careful of routineing mistakes. rep rise check words that you normally know you misspell (e. g. exercise). Try to finish 2-3 transactions before time is up so you can slowly re-read your essay for the purposes of spell checking. Do not reorganize/ offset sentences/paragraphs with less than 2 min left. No matter how great you thought your essays went, try to stay humble and focused rally this was just a warm-up and the real stuff hasnt started yetGood constituent - Here is an essay I wrote for a PR Test Graded a 6. 0 (normally they grade harder than real thing) prod The self-direction of any acres is establish on the strength of its borders if the number of misbranded immigrants entering a soil cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity element are endangered. Because ill-gotten immigrants pose such threats, every effort essential be made to return them to their country of origin. denomination Discuss how well-reasoned you find this argument.In your discussion, be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might expose the conclusion. You can also discuss what change of evidence would strengthen or overthrow the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. This argument relies heavily on unverified assumptions and has a very primitive conclusion.The author fails to make logical connections between the evidence provided and the conclusion that all iniquitous aliens must be returned to their country of origin. The first bother with the argument is that it suffers from multiple unsubstantiated claims. The first evidence that is given to support the fundamental conclusion is that the autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders. This statement is also positive because i t infers that every countries autonomy could be ranked by the strength of its borders. There are many European countries that have very little strength exerted at the borders, but all the same maintain autonomy.The author should clarify this statement by grouping countries together or exploitation a more vague statement that would include most countries but not all. The next statement in the argument is conditional phrase stating that the more illegal immigrants that enter a country the worse off the economy and national identity will be. While this statement might be true for some countries it is sure as shooting not true for all countries. The very foundation of early US society was based on immigrant labor and glossiness that brought from over the sea. There are still many countries whose economy is heavily dependent on immigrant labor.Even though many economic expert feel this statement is true in the US today, most would disagree that this statement is true of all countries . The final fate of the authors argument is the conclusion. The conclusion states that the because of disadvantages mentioned earlier all illegal immigrants must be returned to their country of origin. Although this statement might appear to be a logical conclusion of this extreme argument it fails to take extra information into account. The author doesnt give any index on how extreme these problems will be or how costly it will be to return the amount of illegal aliens to their spot country.What if the cost to the economy was half the amount that it would cost to send all of the immigrants back to their country of origin? The author could use some monetary figures to prove that some savings would be incurred if all illegal immigrants were deported. In conclusion, the argument suffers from logical flaws and makes an extreme conclusion based on on trial assumptions. The addition of hard examples and connections between the statements would prove to strengthen the argument. *This just shows you how you dont have to write great to get a good score*

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.